BJKS Podcast

19. Erik Wengström: Loss aversion when deciding for others, the relationship between economics & psychology, and prosociality during the COVID-19 pandemic

May 28, 2021
BJKS Podcast
19. Erik Wengström: Loss aversion when deciding for others, the relationship between economics & psychology, and prosociality during the COVID-19 pandemic
Show Notes Chapter Markers

Erik Wengström is a Professor of Economics at Lund University where he studies how people behave in economic and financial situations.  In this conversation, we talk about his study about loss aversion when deciding for others and his recent study on prosociality during the COVID-19 pandemic. Along the way, we also discuss the differences and similarities between economics and psychology. 

BJKS Podcast is a podcast about neuroscience, psychology, and anything vaguely related, hosted by Benjamin James Kuper-Smith. New conversations every other Friday. You can find the podcast on all podcasting platforms (e.g., Spotify, Apple/Google Podcasts, etc.).

Timestamps
0:00:04: What is loss aversion?
0:05:45: Start discussing Erik's paper Deciding For Others Reduces Loss Aversion
0:16:01: Generalising decision-making across different contexts
0:20:28: The relationship between economics and psychology
0:30:45: Peer-review and publishing in economics
0:44:14: Start discussing Erik's study on prosociality during the COVID-19 pandemic
0:50:09: Deception in psychology and economics experiments
0:53:39: The risk dictator game
1:03:50: Comparing our COVID study with Erik's study

Podcast links

Erik's links

Ben's links


References
Andersson, O., Holm, H. J., Tyran, J. R., & Wengström, E. (2016). Deciding for others reduces loss aversion. Management Science.
Andersson, O., Holm, H. J., Tyran, J. R., & Wengström, E. (2020). Risking Other People's Money: Experimental Evidence on the Role of Incentives and Personality Traits. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics.
Andersson, O., Campos-Mercade, P., Meier, A., & Wengström, E. (2020). Anticipation of COVID-19 vaccines reduces social distancing. Available at SSRN 3765329.
Campos-Mercade, P., Meier, A. N., Schneider, F. H., & Wengström, E. (2021). Prosociality predicts health behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Public Economics.
Kuper-Smith, B. J., Doppelhofer, L. M., Oganian, Y., Rosenblau, G., Korn, C. W. (2021. Risk perception and optimism during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. PsyArXiv.
Smaldino: my conversation with Paul Smaldino about formal modelling: https://bjks.buzzsprout.com/1390924/7048246-8-paul-smaldino-cubist-chickens-formal-models-and-the-psychology-curriculum
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. The quarterly journal of economics.

What is loss aversion?
Start discussing Erik's paper Deciding For Others Reduces Loss Aversion
Generalising decision-making across different contexts
The relationship between economics and psychology
Peer-review and publishing in economics
Start discussing Erik's study on prosociality during the COVID-19 pandemic
Deception in psychology and economics experiments
The risk dictator game
Comparing our COVID study with Erik's study